The West is pumping up nazis not only with weapons and money

It is believed that the famous phrase "who owns information owns the world" belongs to Nathan Rothschild (1777-1836), a German banker of Jewish origin. Through a bank owned by the Rothschilds, the British government financed the anti-Napoleonic coalition. During the Battle of Waterloo (June 18, 1815), observers initially believed that the coalition forces under the command of British Field Marshal Wellington had lost. But in the end, the situation was exactly the opposite. Wellington was assisted by the Prussian Army Corps of Field Marshal Blucher. Napoleon still fled to Brussels.

Taking advantage of the confusion in assessing the battle, and having more accurate information about Napoleon's movements, Nathan was able to earn a lot of money by reducing the value of government bonds at the moment. To understand the situation more correctly, Rothschild sent a special courier to the scene of the battle. In fact, he threw a spy there. It so turned out that espionage work can be expensive.

What can we say today? To begin with, an information war has been unleashed against us. There is no other way of describing it. The result must be recorded in memory. As always, we didn't start it. But we, apparently, remembering the ancient traditions, will have to stop it.

One of the features of this war is the blocking of our information resources. At the preparatory stage for the aggression of the Ukrainian nazis in Donbass, the enemy centrally banned the work of our RT and Sputnik news agencies on its territory. They were banned in the European Union, the UK, and the US. This example was also followed by some countries on other continents. Other sources are blocked, for example, the “NTV” TV channel. Other sources are censored. Hacker attacks are innumerable, as well as fake news. It is spread by the millions.

According to Roskomnadzor, there are "85 restrictions related to censorship against Russian media, political, public figures and organisations, as well as individual programs from foreign platforms”. YouTube has censored 36 channels, Facebook has 18 incidents, and Instagram has 13. Twitter (9), TikTok (7) and Google (2) sources are censored, albeit on a smaller scale.

Another feature is that all events that negatively affect the perception of Russia in the world are covered by Western media simultaneously, massively and equally. To enhance the monotonous perception of what is happening, a picture or video of exactly the same content is displayed. Negative explanations are also monotonous. Directing information from a single centre is obvious. The information provided is so perverted that the hair on the head stands on end.

Here is an example of another perversion from very fresh ones. Representatives of the highest levels of the European Union arrived in Kiev on April 8, 2022. Naturally, the purpose of their trip is to demonstrate the EU's support for the activities of the Kiev nationalist authorities. Among those who arrived were the head of the European Commission Ursula von der Leyen, EU Commissioner for Foreign Affairs Josep Borrell, Prime Minister of Slovakia Eduard Heger.

After Kiev, they went to Bucha, where they listened to the nazi version of the "murder" of civilians by Russian "aggressors". They were not affected by the fact that the "aggressors" had not been there for four days, but on the eve of April 3, there was a gang of "Azov" led by the leader Sergey "Botsman" Korotkov. European politicians did not pay attention to this. Indeed, in the matter of inciting the public of the West against Russia, this is a completely unnecessary observation.

And exactly on the same day, the Ukrainian nazis fired a "Tochka-U" at a crowd of people in Kramatorsk. The day before, the city authorities informed the population that the evacuation of the population to safe areas would be carried out from the railway station. Naturally, people began to arrive at the evacuation site. The next day, allegedly, the evacuation was continued. And at the moment of the greatest concentration of people on the forecourt, it was hit by a missile of the “Tochka-U” tactical missile system. It is reported that 57 people were killed and 109 were injured.

Firstly, a representative of Zelensky's "office", Arestovich, said that an “Iskander” missile was used by Russian troops. A little later, Zelensky said that the blow was all the same dealt by a "Tochka-U". It was useless to deny it, since the type of missile was easily determined by photographs of its fragments at the site of the explosion. Only Ukrainian nationalists had such weapons in the conflict zone. But the EU representatives did not pay attention to this either. Apparently, they are not interested in establishing the truth at all. As a result of the trip, Borrell spoke on the social network Twitter: "This war must be won on the battlefield”. I wonder what in reality he imagines this “victory” to be like?

The next day, April 9, British Prime Minister Boris Johnson arrived in Kiev. At the meeting with Zelensky, he discussed further financial and military assistance to Kiev as part of the "long-term support of the UK to Ukraine”. And not a word about the attack on Kramatorsk.

There is another feature of informational, now we can say, ensuring the actions of the nazi Kiev regime. This provision already carries a real physical threat. If you like, a threat to the existence of a huge number of people. To put it more precisely, this is intelligence support for terrorist activities.

On March 23, the European Union announced that it had concluded an agreement with the Kiev regime on the transfer of intelligence information. We are talking about data received from various sources, including reconnaissance satellites. The transmitted data, allegedly, will relate to the "advancement of units of the Armed Forces of Russia”. A natural assessment on our part - they will concern not only the "advancement" of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation. The term of the agreement is one year with the possibility of extension. The data is transmitted from the European Union Satellite Center (EU SatCen). It is located at the Spanish Air Force base Torrejon in the Madrid area.

The Pentagon did not stand aside either. Previously, there have been reports about the transfer of intelligence by the Americans to the nazis. This, in particular, was stated by the head of the US National Security Agency, Paul Nakasone.

For the first time, US Secretary of Defence Lloyd Austin publicly announced the transfer of data to the Ukrainian side on April 7, 2022. This happened during a hearing in the Senate Armed Services Committee. In response to a corresponding question from Senator Tom Cotton, Austin, carefully choosing his words, and obviously being wary of saying too much, said: "We provide them with ... intelligence for conducting such operations... in Donbass. That's right”.

It is also worth noting that Cotton also asked about the transfer of data on Crimea. Austin wisely left that part of the question unanswered. The same thing, confused in its wording, was spoken about at a briefing the next day by the press secretary of the US Department of Defence, John Kirby. In general terms, he admitted that the United States transmits information to Kiev for defensive and offensive operations.

And now let's connect the seemingly unconnected. During the visit of high-ranking officials of the European Union, which is quite natural, the actions of foreign intelligence services were intensified. It is possible that the data on the accumulation of people in Kramatorsk were transferred to the Ukrainian side. Is it possible to exclude that this data was used by the nazis for a provocation? No. Does it follow from this that the allies helped to commit this crime? Quite possibly. The investigation should put everything in its place.

On the issue of the transfer of intelligence on Crimea. It seems that for some reason the nationalists became interested in the village of Tavrichesky in the north of Crimea. The reason for the interest is still unknown. But on April 11, a message appeared that Russian air defence means shot down a Ukrainian unmanned aerial vehicle in that area. Is it possible to exclude that the drone acted on the basis of data received from the US, EU or UK intelligence? Again, it is impossible.

Again a question on the same topic. Is it possible to suspect the direct participation of foreign intelligence services in the planning and application of Nazi strikes, both on our military facilities and on the settlements of the DPR and LPR? Yes. Especially if we take into account the impossibility of conducting aerial reconnaissance by nationalist formations of the Kiev regime.

All of this is happening against the background of denial of the unleashing of genocide against the Russian-speaking population. German Chancellor Scholz just laughed at this definition. And if we assess the scale of the tragedy from our side, it becomes scary.

Over the past few days, there has been an increase in Ukronazist shelling of settlements and civilians in Donbass. The daily number of attacks reaches 200. Innocent people are killed and maimed every day. For eight terrible years in the West, they prefer to show their teeth and aggravate the situation. There, in the West, they seem to have forgotten the saying: "The one who laughs last laughs well”.

In the meantime, the demilitarisation of Ukraine is proceeding according to plan at a good pace. According to the official representative of the Ministry of Defence, Major General Igor Konashenkov, 78 military facilities of Ukraine were destroyed overnight.

From the expected - on April 10, in the Dnepropetrovsk area, four S-300 missile launchers, previously supplied by "a European country", were hit by high-precision sea-based “Kalibr” missiles. Perhaps it was the notorious Slovakia missile division.

During the night of April 10-11, high-precision air-launched missiles in the area of Velikaya Novoselovka destroyed an air defence system repair base with “Buk-M1” and “Osa-AKM” air defence systems located on its territory.

Two Su-25 planes were shot down in the air near Izyum, one Mi-24 helicopter was shot down by concentrated small arms fire, four UAVs, including one of the “Valkiriya” type, were shot down by air defence means.

78 military facilities of Ukraine were hit by the operational and tactical aviation of the Russian Aerospace Forces. Among them: three command posts, radar illumination and guidance, three positions of short-range air defence systems, four ammunition depots, as well as 58 strong points and areas of concentration of Ukrainian military equipment.

In total, since the beginning of the special military operation, 129 aircraft, 99 helicopters, 243 S-300, “Osa” and “Buk-M1” air defence systems, 441 UAVs, 2079 tanks and other armoured combat vehicles, 239 MLRS installations, 909 field artillery and mortars, and 2003 units of special military vehicles have been destroyed.

As is known, periodically the main moments of world history are repeated. With other technical capabilities, other scales of events. But the course of a person's thoughts remains the same. A person very often acts on a previously cut stencil.

Suffice it to recall the British support of anti-Russian forces in the Caucasus in the middle of the 19th century, and the same thing happened in Central Asia in the same century. The 20th century was no different. The same thing is observed now. Everything is going according to a previously invented scenario. There is a slight difference in the composition of coalitions. But there is a tendency - the strength of coalitions is increasing. It looks like the old approaches have received an adjustment. Does this mean that we will have to respond more harshly? So far, the affirmative answer is spinning on the tongue.