Consequences of Covid – who profits?

Death in a year from the consequences of covid?! Such details should be clearly diagnosed by the consensus of specialists. And not because there should be censorship, but because the semi-literate judgments of non-core doctors distort the real picture. Sometimes it seems to me that a critical analysis of publications about Covid does not make sense. Then, after reading the next "opus", I understand that the harm of disinformation is like bombing the civilian population.

We have already discussed the topic of registering the causes of death. In order to know the nuances and details of the problem well, it is necessary to have a higher medical education. By the way, it should be clearly understood that even with a total lesion of the lungs or complete failure of the kidneys or liver, a person will live as long as the heart beats or the brain works. Despite the fact that only cardiac arrest or brain death is the real cause of death, the specialist indicates another reason in the certificate. Why? See the item about higher medical education.

Other "news" for "experts" is that the highest mortality has always been from DCS (diseases of the circulatory system), i.e. from cardiovascular disasters. I have already mentioned that 38% of cardiac decompensations are caused by infection (data from the international consensus of cardiologists).

Another quote. "The data of the Framingham Study (USA) show that the main cause of CHF (chronic heart failure) is coronary (ischemic) heart disease - 40% each in men and women; in second place is hypertension - 37% in women and 30% in men. In addition, some patients have a combination of coronary heart disease and hypertension. The annual mortality rate of patients with CHF, despite the introduction of new treatment methods, remains high... with 4th Functional Class, it reaches 66%”. This is 1997.

I cite old data to show that even before the coronavirus pandemic, people were not immortal, and they died most often from vascular catastrophes – heart attacks, strokes, thrombosis of arteries and veins, including thromboembolism of various branches of the pulmonary artery, and from the so-called sudden cardiac death.

For a practicing doctor, it is very strange to conclude that a stroke six months after escherichia coli is just a stroke, and 6 months after a covid is a post-covid syndrome. And here is a scientific publication from pulmonologists.

"The problem of sudden death (SD) in recent years has become increasingly important for various types of pathology... Every year in Western Europe, up to 300,000 people over 35 years old suddenly die, in the United States – 300,000-400,000, or 1,000 people per day. At the age of 20-64, 32% die. It was noted that these people smoked more often, took medications, cocaine, among them persons of the black race prevailed." Journal "Pulmonology" No. 2'2010, A. L. Chernyaev, A. G. Chuchalin "Sudden death in respiratory pathology", pp. 91-95.

The numbers are impressive, aren't they? A thousand people a day die in the United States only from sudden cardiac death! Without post-covid syndrome! Exactly the same level of judgment about the decrease in immunity after a covid.

Any infection is activated against the background of a decrease in immunity, this is known to everyone. It is also known that panic, depression and anxiety disorders, fear reduce immunity. There is also the effect of immunosuppressive therapy, i.e. treatment with drugs that reduce immunity. Practitioners know that the therapy of rheumatoid arthritis reduces immunity by an average of 6 months after discontinuation of treatment. And this effect is regarded as the consequences of therapy.

Why is someone trying to interpret the same effect differently with similar treatment regimens? Why is information about the consequences so actively introduced a year after the infection? The answer is easy to find – pharmaceutical business.

Pfizer is an American multinational pharmaceutical company, one of the largest in the world. Apixaban was approved for the prevention of stroke in people with atrial fibrillation on December 28, 2012. On March 13, 2014, it was approved as an additional indication for the prevention of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism in people who have recently undergone a knee or hip replacement.

On August 21, 2014, the FDA approved Apixaban as an additional indication for the treatment of recurrent deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism. By the end of 2019, BMS product sales accounted for thirty percent of their quarterly revenue." (Wikipedia). Great business plan, Pfizer!

All patients with chronic diseases of any organ of the human body in our country are subject to medical supervision, have the right to rehabilitation measures, including prevention of cardiovascular disasters. Do not think that before the coronavirus pandemic, no one dealt with these issues in our country. We have clinical recommendations for each medical problem, which are updated every 3 years in accordance with new scientific data. There are competent experts in every field who will give a head start to foreigners.

However, there is no magic pill in the world that gives immortality. And in rehabilitation, a very important point is the modification of one’s lifestyle. That is, a person should understand that their health is mainly in their hands, and this means not only taking medications, but also leading a healthy lifestyle, doing morning exercises, walking 2 hours a day. The same international experts have estimated that the role of medicine in improving the health indicators of the population does not exceed 10%.